The Journal · July 2, 2026 · 4 min read
Behind every successful renovation is a well-chosen contractual setup. Both models compared honestly — including when ours is not the right choice.
The classic setup: you sign with an architect for design and project supervision, then with each trade (plumber, electrician, plasterer…) separately. The architect coordinates, but each company is contractually responsible for its own package only.
The general contractor: you sign a single contract with one company that carries everything — design, execution, coordination of all trades — and commits to a price, a timeline and a result. This is W.A.R.D's model, also known as design & build.
| Criterion | Architect + trades | General contractor |
|---|---|---|
| Contacts | 5 to 15 separate contracts | One contract |
| Responsibility | Diluted per package — disputes between companies are your problem | Global — one party responsible for the result |
| Price | Theoretically optimisable package by package | Committed at signature, contingencies better absorbed |
| Timelines | Depend on coordination between companies | Contractually committed |
| Your mental load | High — constant arbitration | Minimal — sign-off at key milestones |
When the classic setup is the right choice: if you have time, genuine site experience, and the desire to run things yourself — or for a very simple, single-trade project. For everything else, a single point of contact protects your budget and your nerves.
A serious professional answers these five questions without hesitation. That is precisely how you recognise one.
Want to see what the integrated model delivers in practice? Browse our projects — from retail for Dior to the heritage renovation of Le Trocadéro — or tell us about your project.